Sunday, May 31, 2026

Completed Set: 1989 Topps Baseball


Quick: Imagine the most generic baseball t-shirt you can.





It probably looks something like that one, right?

Well, I'll tell you something. It's exactly what the 1989 Topps design reminds me of. Just look at the bottom of this next card, for example.




It's so generic that Dallas Green appears to be wincing with disappointment.

And if you want to get the full thrust of it, here are the logos from the t-shirt and the card together, matched for color.






Same thing? 

Yeah. Pretty much.


And listen. It's not necessarily a bad thing. Baseball cards are about fun. And familiarity. And baseball. So if you were a baseball-playing kid back in 1989 and saw that the script team name on your Little League jersey looked very much like the script team names on the new Topps baseball cards that you were pulling from packs, you might have been psyched about it. After all, you can't have too much baseball in your life, right? So again, not a bad thing.

But for the 1989 version of Gregory Ninepockets, the design did seem a bit plain.

He had just started getting into the sport of ice hockey, and Topps hockey cards were much more interesting that year, with the pushpin design in the top corner and the Roy Lichtenstein–style dotted background underneath the player name.

So that didn't help young Gregory's opinion of 1989 Topps baseball cards.

You know what else didn't help?

The Upper Deck company.




They released their inaugural baseball card set that same year. And it was not plain.

I wonder how closely the new company kept everything under wraps back then. Just imagine the team at Topps finishing up production of their 1989 baseball set and feeling pretty good about it. Then imagine them seeing Upper Deck's set for the first time, with its foil pack wrappers, bright white card stock, hologram technologyand full-color images on the card backs.

I can picture a Topps exec opening his first Upper Deck pack that year, and reacting like this as he flipped through each card:




I know many of us kids back then reacted in a similar way when we saw Upper Deck cards for the first time.

In any case, let's look at some 1989 Topps cards, because that's really what we're here for today. And there's some goodness to be had.




Topps was always solid when it came to providing us with some classic batting stance photos.





Same for the pitching poses. The photographers made Goose look 10 feet tall. And Jim Gott looks rather heroic from that angle, don't you think?





Headshots abound in this set, which might seem boring. But oftentimes the players are very happy. I like that in a baseball card. To reiterate: Baseball is fun.

You know what else is fun?

Subsets!

And 1989 Topps gives us a few good ones.




The #1 Draft Pick cards were pretty cool for young collectors, and showed players in their college uniforms. (Or in the case of Steve Avery, high school!) Topps earns a little bit of credit there.




The rookie cup subset featured some big names at the time, too. (See how nice it is when the cup is always tucked in the bottom corner like that?)




The All-star design continued the generic script theme, but fancied things up a little bit.





The Team Leaders subset returned, and for the fourth year in a row, Topps went with the same cloud-like border. But that repetitiveness almost doesn't matter, because these cards tell the story of baseball so well. Bonus points to the Topps photographer who captured the "Bash Brothers" doing their thing on the Oakland A's card.




Topps also brought back some other favorite subsets, like Record Breakers and Turn Back the Clock. As for the checklist, it felt slightly more modern than standard.





Speaking of more modern, the Future Star cards received a new design. Sheffield, Jefferies, and Alomar were all highly sought after back then.




And on the subject of young stars, Topps did get some good rookies into the base set. In addition to Sheffield and Alomar up there, Biggio, Johnson, and Smoltz would all end up having Hall-of-Fame careers. 

The glaring omission, of course, was Ken Griffey Jr. Most of the other major brands did manage to get him into their base sets, so it was disappointing to young collectors that Topps missed the boat there. (The Topps Traded set was where you'd find Griffey Junior, along with other stars like Deion Sanders, Tom Gordon, and Omar Vizquel.)

But let's get back to the good stuff.





There are some nice action shots to be found throughout the base set.




And some cool cards featuring players with their choice of lumber.





Players with glasses were still a thing, too.





In addition, some excellent color matching occurs in this set. I think a binder page filled with 9 players from any of the teams above would look pretty sweet. 
(Other teams leave something to be desired. For example, the Angels have a magenta-purple-yellow thing going on, while the orange and blue Mets almost had something special until Topps gave them a red border for some reason.)


Anyway, let's look at a card back now.



The good stuff continues here. Not only is the black text fairly easy to read on that light pink background, but Topps added an interesting little table at the bottom of many cards. The "monthly scoreboard" section allowed us to go a little deeper into the stats of our favorite players, showing total home runs and RBI per month. For pitchers, the table displayed wins and strikeouts per month.


So that's 1989 Topps baseball. Fun, and some good qualities, but if I'm completely honest? A little bit underwhelming.

Regardless, I'm happy to have this set completed and checked off the list. 

How about you readers? If you were collecting back in 1989, how did you feel about the Topps baseball release? And how do you feel about it these days?

Share in the comment section, and thanks for reading!

14 comments:

  1. 9P to me the 1989 Topps set was like the 1988 Donruss set a bit overwhelming at times. Topps tried to make a wrong by another company by placing an actual correct version of a player who was featured in a set 2 years prior & happened to be on the same team as you mentioned of the missing person. If you look Topps saw a player wearing a Mariners uniform at a stadium in which he grew up miles from holding his bat all taped up saying Donruss this is the player you screwed up on in 1987 this player is the player that after many years in riding the Minor League buses someone who after the 1988 season had played in only 54 games in the major leagues has potential to be in the 1989 Topps set & not even 2 years removed from High School a kid that who grew up watching his daddy play in the game sharing the same name as his dad need to be in the regular issued set. Instead we want this guy sure 54 games isn't worthy but we want him to have a card with his stats his name his correct photo on a card so he doesn't have to say yes I made it to the major leagues & 1 company made my rookie card only to feature someone else on it we'll also show you the player you featured also in the set. Meanwhile a company making its debut with its new technological way of making cards decision was to go with both the kid who would make or break the company by placing him in card slot #1 then saying Donruss we also want to correct the wrong photo by giving this player an alternate choice to sign cards but will put that player at card #238 spot & Donruss we'll also like Topps show you the guy that you featured on that player's card we'll place him at #339 so we covered all 3 spots. Now you ask me who's the player that the 1989 Topps included that Upper Deck included by showing the 3 players to Donruss quite simple Bruce Fields who've I talked about on my blog post on July 21st 2025. So looking back at 1989 the break down for cards was like this Topps gave us the gum Fleer gave us the words to use at school Donruss showed us a spectrum of colors on the boarders Score showed us the Lights at Wrigley Sportflics they wanted to say in 2 years we'll be gone cause the new kid of Upper Deck showed us we can't compete with their new technology.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you've just set the record for the longest comment on my blog, sir! And yes, the card companies all took quite different directions with their sets in 1989, didn't they?

      Delete
  2. The only set I have completed twice. Have mentioned on my blog several times that I went a bid mad trying to complete this set the first time, buying packs solely from a drug store in a strip mall in suburban Buffalo. I came 4 cards short and piled up as many as 20 versions of several cards.

    Because of that -- or maybe because the design is so plain -- the cards have kind of lost their meaning for me, never to return I fear. I do like the set, but yeah, looking back it's the dullest set Topps put out in the '80s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, 20 versions of the same card? Ouch. But the dedication is impressive, and much appreciated by this blogger and fellow collector.

      Delete
  3. Not the biggest fan of the 1989 Topps flagship baseball card design. Always thought it was kind of plain and boring. That being said, I like it a little more than the 1988 Topps flagship baseball design. My favorite thing about 89T is the All-Star subset design. I think they look really cool.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm with you there, Fuji. The All-Star subset and the team leaders subset are the nicest ones for me.

      Delete
  4. Congrats on the set completion.
    They're a little bit boring, but the team name, player name, and card number are all easy to read, which is more than I can say for some other sets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks very much, Elliptical Man! Very good point about the readability on the card backs.

      Delete
  5. I liked it well enough at the time, and it still holds a bit of nostalgia, but it was basic. I don't think any two back-to-back sets had such a contrast as 1989 and 1990 Topps...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oof, that's true! The 1990 set design was quite a surprise, especially compared with 1989.

      Delete
  6. Happy completed set! I must've liked it quite a bit as a kid -- I certainly bought enough of it. The design doesn't do much for me now, though, to be fair, neither do most of the others from that era. Even though they used it for a few years, the look of the Team Leaders still appeals to me; maybe more now, than it did then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Much appreciated, Jon! There's definitely something nice about how Topps used the same design for the Team Leaders subset for a few years, there. Oftentimes the photography is great, too. And it was always fun to flip those cards over to see which players led the team in various categories.

      Delete
  7. I grew up with this set and didnt like it. Good on you for completing it, and making it look interesting!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks very much, Chris! There's usually some good stuff to talk about with any set of cards -- even with ones like 1990 Donruss or 1995 Fleer ;-)

      Delete